Copley Fund Research Fund Positioning Chart Pack. October 2023

1600+ Active Equity Funds, AUM $4.7tr

Fund Positioning Chart Pack: October 2023

This week, selected charts and commentary from our Global, EM and Asia Ex-Japan research.
• Global Equity Managers Trim EM Underweight, but Remain Bearish
• EM Industrials Deep Dive
• Baidu: Back in the Mix

349 GLOBAL EQUITY FUNDS, AUM $999BN

Global Equity Managers Trim EM Underweight, but Remain Bearish

The heavy decline in EM allocations that started in early 2021 came to an end last October. Since then, a growing number of funds are rotating back in or moving to an overweight stance.

Time Series Analysis & Country Drivers

Active Global managers have been positioned underweight Emerging Markets since our records begin in late 2012. Chart 1 below shows the consistent gap between the average active allocation (blue) and the iShares ACWI weight (yellow). This underweight hit a peak of -4.63% following a heavy rotation away from EM between Jan 2021 and October 2022. During this period, EM average weights fell from 10.4% to 6.4% and the percentage of funds with any EM exposure from 97.7% to 92.8%. However, since that bottom last October, some Global managers have started to rotate back in, with selected funds either switching to overweight or reinstating their recently closed exposures.

The countries driving this rotation? Fund activity between 10/31/2022 and 08/31/2023 shows China & HK and Taiwan as the drivers behind the moves higher in average weight (ch1), though the decrease in EM underweight was caused by rotation in to Taiwan and Indonesia (ch2). In LATAM, Mexico was a notable recipient of inward rotation whilst Global funds scaled back their Brazilian exposure. In our full analysis, we find that Global funds hold 83% of their total EM allocation in the big 4 of China & HK, Taiwan, South Korea and India, with China the dominant country by a margin.

Summary

The chart to the right shows the Z-Score of each fund’s current weight in EM compared to all historical values going back to 2012. A Score of 100% means today’s weight is the highest on record for that fund, 0% the lowest. The quartile values tell the story, with half of the managers in our analysis at a Z-score of 20.8% or less, and 75% with a Z-Score of 45.3% or less. In short, managers are lightly positioned compared to their own history.

It’s almost hard to believe that despite all the coverage and buzz around emerging markets this year, they only make up 6.99% of the average global portfolio. Although ownership is no longer declining, the recent uptick feels more of a cautious step rather than a full-on turn in sentiment. The fact remains that 77% of the global funds in our analysis are positioned for underperformance – we’re a long way from bullish positioning in EM.

In the full analysis we look at individual fund exposures in EM and see which managers have been increasing and decreasing their EM allocations this year.  Also, we drill down in to the stock holdings that underpin the current EM allocation.  You might be surprised to learn that only 6 EM companies are owned by more than 10% of the Global funds in our analysis, and those 6 companies account for 38% of the total EM allocation.

372 EMERGING MARKET FUNDS, AUM $402BN

EM Industrials Deep Dive

Industrials sector weights sit near record highs, but current data suggests a period of consolidation and stalling momentum among EM Managers.

Time Series Analysis & Market Cap Split

Ownership levels in the Industrials sector have risen to new highs over the last 3 years. Average fund weights broke through the 8% barrier in early 2022 and have held on to those gains, though we appear to have entered a period of consolidation as weights have failed to push on any further since then (ch1). Versus the benchmark, active managers remain overweight Industrials on average, but the size of the overweight has fallen towards the bottom of the long-term range (ch2), with a declining number of funds positioned ahead of the index (ch4).

If we break down that average weight figure by the Market Cap focus of the fund, we find that Small/Midcap strategies have long allocated more than their larger cap peers in the Industrials sector. Average weights among the 19 Small/Midcap strategies in our analysis stand at 15.64%, more than double that for both Large/Megacap and Large-Cap funds. However, the time-series chart shows how the growth in Industrials weights since 2020 has been mainly driven by Large/Mega, Large-Cap and Blend Strategies, who are all close to record levels of exposure.

Summary

Industrials exposure among active Emerging Market funds appears to be at a consolidation point. The momentum that took average weights from sub-6% in 2019 to 8%+ today has faded, though there are no signs of a full scale reversal.

The chart opposite shows the number of companies that have found investment from the 372 active EM funds in our analysis, split by sector and the Market Cap of the stock. Industrials has more companies capturing investment than any other sector, with 682 stocks in total and 327 of those with a Market Cap of below $2bn.

When combined with the fact that Small/Midcap strategies are allocating substantially more to the Industrials sector than their Large Cap peers, it highlights the breadth of opportunity within the sector. Perhaps the next leg higher will be driven by the next generation of companies at the lower end of the market cap spectrum – there is certainly no lack of investible opportunities.

In the full analysis we delve in to the key Industrials stocks that make up the bulk of the allocations among active EM managers, and identify the companies that Small/Midcap managers are taking the largest positions in.

103 ASIA EX-JAPAN FUNDS, AUM $61.4BN

Baidu: Back in the Mix

After a heavy decline in ownership between 2016 and 2020, active Asia Ex-Japan managers are re-engaging with Baidu Inc..

Time-Series & Stock Level Activity

Asia Ex-Japan fund ownership in Baidu Inc. is back on the rise. The percentage of funds with a position in Baidu Inc. fell from a high of 47.1% in April 2016 to a low of just 7.9% in April 2020, but since then has recovered strongly (ch3). The 31.1% of funds invested and 29.1% who are positioned overweight (ch4) represents a 4-year high, with underweights decreasing and absolute weights increasing in tandem (ch1&2).
Baidu Inc. has been one of the key beneficiaries of active manager rotation over the past 6-months. The charts below show the change in our ownership metrics between 02/28/2023 and 08/31/2023. Baidu Inc. saw the joint highest funds invested increase of 6.8% alongside Li-Auto (ch3), and the highest increase in the percentage of funds positioned overweight (ch4). The fact that all measures of ownership moved higher confirms the active nature of the rotation.

Summary

Drilling down to a fund level provides further details of this active rotation, as the chart to the right shows. All Style groups except GARP saw ownership levels rise, led predominantly by Growth funds and the small number of Yield funds in our analysis. Of the 103 funds we track, 26 increased weights in Baidu Inc. and 9 opened new positions compared to just 2 closing.

The fact that managers are re-engaging with the name after such a heavy period of selling between 2016 and 2020 confirms a marked turnaround in the investment case. In our full analysis, we find that Value funds are among the top investors, but a growing number of Growth funds are buying in to the story. As it stands though, we are a long way from peak ownership. A total of 86 Asia Ex-Japan funds have owned Baidu Inc. at some point over the last decade, but only 32 are currently invested. There is plenty of potential for ownership to move higher from here.

To request access to the full reports mentioned above or inquire about a subscription to our research, please e-mail me directly on the below:

steven.holden@copleyfundresearch.com

If you’re an investor in our markets, we invite you to connect with us.