Copley Fund Research Fund Positioning Chart Pack. October 2023

1600+ Active Equity Funds, AUM $4.7tr

Fund Positioning Chart Pack: October 2023

This week, selected charts and commentary from our Global, EM and Asia Ex-Japan research.
• Global Equity Managers Trim EM Underweight, but Remain Bearish
• EM Industrials Deep Dive
• Baidu: Back in the Mix

349 GLOBAL EQUITY FUNDS, AUM $999BN

Global Equity Managers Trim EM Underweight, but Remain Bearish

The heavy decline in EM allocations that started in early 2021 came to an end last October. Since then, a growing number of funds are rotating back in or moving to an overweight stance.

Time Series Analysis & Country Drivers

Active Global managers have been positioned underweight Emerging Markets since our records begin in late 2012. Chart 1 below shows the consistent gap between the average active allocation (blue) and the iShares ACWI weight (yellow). This underweight hit a peak of -4.63% following a heavy rotation away from EM between Jan 2021 and October 2022. During this period, EM average weights fell from 10.4% to 6.4% and the percentage of funds with any EM exposure from 97.7% to 92.8%. However, since that bottom last October, some Global managers have started to rotate back in, with selected funds either switching to overweight or reinstating their recently closed exposures.

The countries driving this rotation? Fund activity between 10/31/2022 and 08/31/2023 shows China & HK and Taiwan as the drivers behind the moves higher in average weight (ch1), though the decrease in EM underweight was caused by rotation in to Taiwan and Indonesia (ch2). In LATAM, Mexico was a notable recipient of inward rotation whilst Global funds scaled back their Brazilian exposure. In our full analysis, we find that Global funds hold 83% of their total EM allocation in the big 4 of China & HK, Taiwan, South Korea and India, with China the dominant country by a margin.

Summary

The chart to the right shows the Z-Score of each fund’s current weight in EM compared to all historical values going back to 2012. A Score of 100% means today’s weight is the highest on record for that fund, 0% the lowest. The quartile values tell the story, with half of the managers in our analysis at a Z-score of 20.8% or less, and 75% with a Z-Score of 45.3% or less. In short, managers are lightly positioned compared to their own history.

It’s almost hard to believe that despite all the coverage and buzz around emerging markets this year, they only make up 6.99% of the average global portfolio. Although ownership is no longer declining, the recent uptick feels more of a cautious step rather than a full-on turn in sentiment. The fact remains that 77% of the global funds in our analysis are positioned for underperformance – we’re a long way from bullish positioning in EM.

In the full analysis we look at individual fund exposures in EM and see which managers have been increasing and decreasing their EM allocations this year.  Also, we drill down in to the stock holdings that underpin the current EM allocation.  You might be surprised to learn that only 6 EM companies are owned by more than 10% of the Global funds in our analysis, and those 6 companies account for 38% of the total EM allocation.

372 EMERGING MARKET FUNDS, AUM $402BN

EM Industrials Deep Dive

Industrials sector weights sit near record highs, but current data suggests a period of consolidation and stalling momentum among EM Managers.

Time Series Analysis & Market Cap Split

Ownership levels in the Industrials sector have risen to new highs over the last 3 years. Average fund weights broke through the 8% barrier in early 2022 and have held on to those gains, though we appear to have entered a period of consolidation as weights have failed to push on any further since then (ch1). Versus the benchmark, active managers remain overweight Industrials on average, but the size of the overweight has fallen towards the bottom of the long-term range (ch2), with a declining number of funds positioned ahead of the index (ch4).

If we break down that average weight figure by the Market Cap focus of the fund, we find that Small/Midcap strategies have long allocated more than their larger cap peers in the Industrials sector. Average weights among the 19 Small/Midcap strategies in our analysis stand at 15.64%, more than double that for both Large/Megacap and Large-Cap funds. However, the time-series chart shows how the growth in Industrials weights since 2020 has been mainly driven by Large/Mega, Large-Cap and Blend Strategies, who are all close to record levels of exposure.

Summary

Industrials exposure among active Emerging Market funds appears to be at a consolidation point. The momentum that took average weights from sub-6% in 2019 to 8%+ today has faded, though there are no signs of a full scale reversal.

The chart opposite shows the number of companies that have found investment from the 372 active EM funds in our analysis, split by sector and the Market Cap of the stock. Industrials has more companies capturing investment than any other sector, with 682 stocks in total and 327 of those with a Market Cap of below $2bn.

When combined with the fact that Small/Midcap strategies are allocating substantially more to the Industrials sector than their Large Cap peers, it highlights the breadth of opportunity within the sector. Perhaps the next leg higher will be driven by the next generation of companies at the lower end of the market cap spectrum – there is certainly no lack of investible opportunities.

In the full analysis we delve in to the key Industrials stocks that make up the bulk of the allocations among active EM managers, and identify the companies that Small/Midcap managers are taking the largest positions in.

103 ASIA EX-JAPAN FUNDS, AUM $61.4BN

Baidu: Back in the Mix

After a heavy decline in ownership between 2016 and 2020, active Asia Ex-Japan managers are re-engaging with Baidu Inc..

Time-Series & Stock Level Activity

Asia Ex-Japan fund ownership in Baidu Inc. is back on the rise. The percentage of funds with a position in Baidu Inc. fell from a high of 47.1% in April 2016 to a low of just 7.9% in April 2020, but since then has recovered strongly (ch3). The 31.1% of funds invested and 29.1% who are positioned overweight (ch4) represents a 4-year high, with underweights decreasing and absolute weights increasing in tandem (ch1&2).
Baidu Inc. has been one of the key beneficiaries of active manager rotation over the past 6-months. The charts below show the change in our ownership metrics between 02/28/2023 and 08/31/2023. Baidu Inc. saw the joint highest funds invested increase of 6.8% alongside Li-Auto (ch3), and the highest increase in the percentage of funds positioned overweight (ch4). The fact that all measures of ownership moved higher confirms the active nature of the rotation.

Summary

Drilling down to a fund level provides further details of this active rotation, as the chart to the right shows. All Style groups except GARP saw ownership levels rise, led predominantly by Growth funds and the small number of Yield funds in our analysis. Of the 103 funds we track, 26 increased weights in Baidu Inc. and 9 opened new positions compared to just 2 closing.

The fact that managers are re-engaging with the name after such a heavy period of selling between 2016 and 2020 confirms a marked turnaround in the investment case. In our full analysis, we find that Value funds are among the top investors, but a growing number of Growth funds are buying in to the story. As it stands though, we are a long way from peak ownership. A total of 86 Asia Ex-Japan funds have owned Baidu Inc. at some point over the last decade, but only 32 are currently invested. There is plenty of potential for ownership to move higher from here.

To request access to the full reports mentioned above or inquire about a subscription to our research, please e-mail me directly on the below:

steven.holden@copleyfundresearch.com

If you’re an investor in our markets, we invite you to connect with us.

Terms and Conditions

Investor Positioning Report — Copley Fund Research Ltd  ·  Last updated: July 2026  ·  Registered in England and Wales

1. Who we are

Copley Fund Research Ltd provides proprietary institutional fund intelligence to listed companies and investor relations professionals. These terms govern every purchase of an Investor Positioning Report. By completing a purchase you confirm you have read, understood, and agreed to these terms in full.

2. What you are purchasing

The Investor Positioning Report is a bespoke PDF report mapping the institutional fund universe around your stock. It covers current investors, past investors, competitor investors, and white space investors. Every report is built from scratch for the specific company ordered and is not a standardised or templated product.

3. Delivery and process

Following payment or invoice issuance, Copley Fund Research will contact you within one working day to agree your competitor set. Production begins once the competitor set is confirmed in writing. The completed report will be released to you within 48 hours of production starting, provided payment has been received in full; where payment is outstanding, the report will be withheld until payment clears. If the requested company falls outside our covered fund universes, or a competitor set cannot be agreed, Copley Fund Research will issue a full refund or cancel the outstanding invoice.

4. Competitor set agreement

The competitor set is agreed with you in writing prior to production, and the report is built to that agreed specification. Requests to amend the competitor set after delivery, based on a change of preference rather than an error, may be treated as a new order.

5. Refund policy

Because each report is produced individually for your company, orders are non-refundable once production has begun, except as set out in clauses 3 and 5a below. By purchasing, you agree not to dispute the charge with your card provider on the basis that the service was not as described, provided the report has been delivered to the agreed specification or corrected under clause 5a.

5a. Quality remedy

If a delivered report contains a material error caused by Copley Fund Research — for example, an incorrect company analysed, a competitor omitted from the agreed set, or content missing from the specification in clause 2 — Copley Fund Research will correct and redeliver the report at no additional charge, within a reasonable timeframe. This is your sole remedy for such errors.

6. Data and accuracy

All fund positioning data in the report reflects holdings as disclosed at the most recently available reporting date at the time of compilation. The timing of fund holdings disclosures is determined by regulatory requirements applicable to each fund and is outside the control of Copley Fund Research Ltd. This data may not reflect current fund positions. Copley Fund Research takes reasonable care to ensure accuracy but makes no warranty, express or implied, as to the completeness or current accuracy of the underlying data — though this does not affect the quality remedy in clause 5a for errors in how that data was analysed or presented. Past fund positioning is not indicative of future fund behaviour or investment decisions.

7. Not investment advice

The Investor Positioning Report is produced for investor relations intelligence purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security. The data reflects historical fund positioning and must not be relied upon as a prediction of future fund behaviour or investment decisions. Copley Fund Research Ltd is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority for the provision of investment advice.

8. Permitted use and confidentiality

The report is licensed for internal use by the purchasing organisation only. You may share it with employees and directors of your organisation. You may not: reproduce, redistribute, publish, or resell the report or any part of it; share it with any third party outside your organisation without prior written consent; use the fund or portfolio manager names contained in the report to approach those individuals on behalf of Copley Fund Research or in a manner that could damage Copley Fund Research's relationships with those funds; or use the data for any purpose other than your own investor relations strategy. The data, analysis, and methodology contained in the report are the intellectual property of Copley